sorted by: new top controversial old
88

lmao imagine that

58
[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago

It's pretty clever honestly.

[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago

Yup but the employers are to blame

[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 22 points 1 week ago

That's a bold prediction.

50
123
3
7
37
[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't necessarily agree that this is concerning. I never thought of gargron of making good moves either though.

158
1
[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 11 points 3 weeks ago

Meh not sure I would want that.

14
submitted 3 weeks ago by sexy_peach@beehaw.org to c/usnews@beehaw.org
[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Cool tech, but I am always sad when it's the big giants adding something new and innovative.

[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

Only use deep learning ai with deepl translations and for some text annotation project I did for uni.

[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

There are devices that measure radioactive decay for operations where truly random numbers are very important. Or something like that, I am not an expert, sorry.

[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Computers can be random with special hardware.

sexy_peach

joined 1 year ago