silence7

More that peoples' movement data isn't worth much, so it wouldn't be a big deal to impose legal requirements on keeping it private.

As Sen. Wyden says:

This is timely in light of JD Vance's comments about wanting to surveil the body of every woman in America. I just dropped a new investigation into car companies selling off your private location data to shady data brokers. The case for federal privacy legislation has never been stronger.

per the article, it's rather better than that.

Pretty much anything trying to predict human behavior is a heuristic; people using them as if they've got some kind of certainty is a problem.

My impression from the article is more that they're not doing any kind of garbage-in assessment: nobody is making sure they're getting answers about the right person (eg: some women date more than one guy) and some women don't feel safe giving accurate answers to the police, and there aren't good failsafes available for when it's wrong; you're forced to hire legal counsel and pursue a change via the courts.

No, not yet. There will probably be one in September or October.

Historically, the answer on this has involved charging very different amounts in different countries. This both enables some level of access by the poor and maximizes profits.

That Saudi. The plan there seems to be to sell off all the oil, and then have the royal family decamp to a more northern latitude with their harems while the rest of the population cooks to death.

Not in the same detailed minute-by-minute tracking of where you've been.

They're also buying tracking data from phone apps, so you'd need to make sure you're not running any of those either.

It's a gift link, so you shouldn't hit the paywall unless you've disabled javascript or are using a browser extension which strips off URL parameters

They cut the size, but not the price. Then they increase the price six months later.